Ghana’s Second-Hand Clothing Industry: A Circular Economy Success Story Unfolding

Circular image of used segmented used clothing on left with the words Ghana's Second-Hand Clothing Trade Success Story on right
Ghana’s Second-Hand Clothing Trade Success Story. Credit: activist360

Jobs, Revenue, and the Environment: Unpacking Ghana’s Second-Hand Clothing Trade

The second-hand clothing (SHC) industry plays a vital role in Ghana’s economy, providing affordable clothing options and supporting millions of livelihoods. Beyond its economic benefits, this trade represents a sustainable approach to addressing global fashion waste. However, misconceptions about waste and quality often overshadow its positive impact. The Ghana Used Clothing Dealers Association published a report earlier this year on the socio-economic and environmental impact of the second-hand clothes trade in Ghana. We take this week’s post as our opportunity dive into the contributions of the SHC trade in Ghana and highlight opportunities for sustainable growth.

The Socio-Economic Benefits of the SHC Trade

Employment Generator

The SHC trade is a significant source of employment in Ghana, directly and indirectly supporting around 2.5 million people. This includes roles such as importers, retailers, tailors, drivers, and waste pickers. These jobs are particularly important for youth and marginalized groups, providing stable income opportunities where few alternatives exist. For many families, this trade is their primary means of livelihood, demonstrating its profound impact on society.

Boosting Government Revenue

The SHC trade not only benefits individuals but also contributes significantly to Ghana’s economy. In 2022, the sector generated $29.5 million in government revenue through import taxes. This amount is noteworthy because it exceeds the funding allocated to major poverty alleviation programs such as the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) initiative. These revenues are vital for national development and help sustain critical social services.

Affordable Apparel

For most Ghanaians, SHC provides a lifeline to affordable clothing. Approximately 95% of the population relies on second-hand clothing to meet their fashion needs. These clothes are not just inexpensive but also durable, allowing families to allocate their limited resources to other essential expenses, such as education and healthcare. The widespread availability of SHC has made it an integral part of Ghana’s consumer culture.

Environmental Impact and Circular Economy

Promoting Sustainability

One of the greatest advantages of the SHC trade is its contribution to sustainability. By reusing and recycling clothing, the trade reduces the environmental footprint of fast fashion, which is known for generating significant waste and pollution. Each item of clothing that is reused extends its lifecycle, keeping it out of landfills and reducing the demand for new textile production.

Minimal Waste Levels

Contrary to misconceptions, the SHC trade in Ghana generates minimal waste. Research shows that only about 5% of imported second-hand clothing bales are unsellable. Traders often find creative ways to repurpose these items, ensuring that very little ends up as waste. This efficiency is a testament to the industry’s adaptability and its alignment with circular economy principles.

Waste Management Practices

The SHC trade has developed effective strategies to handle unsold items:

  • Discount sales: Items are sold at reduced prices to clear inventory.
  • Donations: Unsold clothes are donated to local charities and community groups.
  • Recycling initiatives: Textiles are repurposed into cleaning materials or industrial inputs, reducing waste and creating additional value.

Addressing Misconceptions

Dispelling the Dumping Myth

A prevalent misconception is that Ghana serves as a dumping ground for low-quality clothing from Western countries. However, evidence suggests otherwise: 95% of imported second-hand clothes are high-quality and suitable for resale. This challenges the narrative that SHC imports are predominantly waste and highlights the rigorous selection processes employed by traders.

Quality Assurance

Importers and retailers in Ghana go to great lengths to ensure the quality of second-hand clothing. They collaborate with trusted suppliers, conduct regular inspections, and adhere to strict industry standards. In fact, 80% of traders follow specific certifications to maintain quality. These efforts ensure that consumers receive valuable and durable clothing.

Challenges and Opportunities

Regulatory and Infrastructure Gaps

Despite its many benefits, the SHC trade faces challenges, particularly in waste management. Ghana lacks robust recycling systems and sustainable disposal infrastructure. Addressing these gaps could enhance the industry’s environmental impact and create new economic opportunities, such as jobs in recycling and upcycling sectors.

Innovations in Upcycling

Upcycling is a growing trend in Ghana, where entrepreneurs transform old or unsellable clothing into higher-value items such as bags, rugs, and accessories. This innovative approach not only reduces waste but also creates new revenue streams for small businesses. Encouraging upcycling initiatives could significantly bolster the circular economy in Ghana.

Summing Up

The second-hand clothing trade in Ghana is a shining example of how economic development and sustainability can go hand in hand. By supporting millions of livelihoods, generating significant government revenue, and promoting environmentally friendly practices, the SHC industry addresses critical socio-economic and environmental challenges. Ghana’s transition to a circular economy is an example of how we can build a future where fashion benefits both people and the planet.


Source: Odonkor, S., Metropolitan Research and Education Bureau, & E-volution International. (2024). An evaluation of the socio-economic and environmental impact of the second-hand clothes trade in Ghana. Ghana Used Clothing Dealers Association.

Are Biodegradable Plastics Truly Eco-Friendly? Unpacking the Facts for a Sustainable Future

Impact Characterization of Biodegradable Plastics
Impact Characterization of Biodegradable Plastics
Credit: Piao, Z., Boakye, A. A. A., & Yao, Y. (2024). Environmental impacts of biodegradable microplastics. Nature Chemical Engineering, 1, 661–669.


When you hear the word “biodegradable,” what comes to mind? Many of us assume biodegradable plastics are a perfect solution for reducing plastic pollution. However, these materials have complex environmental impacts that aren’t immediately obvious. While they can help reduce certain types of pollution, they also come with hidden trade-offs, including greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change.

In this article, we’ll dive into the environmental impacts of biodegradable plastics, explain how Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) helps scientists understand their effects, and offer tips for more eco-friendly choices.

What Are Biodegradable Plastics?

Biodegradable plastics are materials designed to break down in the environment faster than traditional plastics. They are typically made from renewable resources, like corn starch or sugarcane, or from fossil-based sources. Common types include plant-based PLA (polylactic acid) and fossil-based PCL (polycaprolactone).

To fully understand their impact, scientists use a process called Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). LCIA evaluates a product’s environmental footprint across its entire life cycle—from production to disposal. This is essential for understanding biodegradable plastics’ real impact on our planet, including factors like greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, and waste management challenges.

Benefits of Biodegradable Plastics in Reducing Microplastic Pollution

One of the most significant benefits of biodegradable plastics is their potential to reduce microplastic pollution. Microplastics are tiny plastic fragments that pollute our oceans, rivers, and even our food and water. Because they don’t easily decompose, they accumulate in ecosystems and can harm wildlife and human health.

Biodegradable plastics offer a promising alternative. When they break down properly, they are less likely to form these harmful microplastics. Scientists assess this potential benefit through a measure in LCIA called aquatic ecotoxicity, which looks at how materials impact aquatic life. Biodegradable plastics typically score lower in aquatic ecotoxicity than traditional plastics because they break down more completely, reducing the risk of long-term pollution.

Think of biodegradable plastics like “biodegradable litter.” If disposed of properly, they disappear without leaving a trace, unlike conventional plastics that break into microplastics and linger in the environment for years.

The schematic diagram of the LCA methodology for biodegradable plastics
Impact Characterization of Biodegradable Plastics
Credit: Piao, Z., Boakye, A. A. A., & Yao, Y. (2024). Environmental impacts of biodegradable microplastics. Nature Chemical Engineering, 1, 661–669, Figure 1.


Hidden Costs of Biodegradable Plastics: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

While biodegradable plastics can reduce visible pollution, they aren’t without environmental costs. As these plastics break down, particularly in natural environments like rivers or forests, they can release greenhouse gases (GHGs) like methane—a potent contributor to climate change.

Here’s a surprising statistic: when PCL, a common biodegradable plastic, breaks down in a natural setting, it can emit up to 16.3 kilograms of CO₂-equivalent per kilogram of plastic. This emission rate is about 16 times higher than what it would release in an industrial composting facility.

Scientists use Global Warming Potential (GWP) within LCIA to measure how much a material contributes to climate change. For biodegradable plastics, scientists often use dynamic GWP calculations, which track greenhouse gas emissions over time rather than assuming a constant rate. This approach reveals that biodegradable plastics can emit GHGs in bursts as they break down, especially under anaerobic (low-oxygen) conditions in natural environments.

In some scenarios, biodegradable plastics that aren’t properly managed may actually emit more greenhouse gases than traditional plastics.

Role of Waste Management in Reducing Environmental Impact

The environmental impact of biodegradable plastics depends heavily on how they are disposed of. Ideally, they should be processed in industrial composting facilities, where conditions like temperature and oxygen are carefully controlled to allow these plastics to break down quickly and with minimal greenhouse gas emissions.

However, when biodegradable plastics end up in natural environments, such as lakes or soil, they break down under uncontrolled conditions, leading to increased emissions.

Think of biodegradable plastics as “biodegradable litter.” Just as litter remains litter if tossed on the ground, biodegradable plastics can still pollute if not disposed of correctly.

This brings us to the End-of-Life (EoL) Impact stage in LCIA. LCIA considers the full “end-of-life” cycle of a product to evaluate its environmental footprint based on where it ends up. Without the proper disposal infrastructure, biodegradable plastics may add to environmental pollution rather than reduce it.

What the Future Holds for Biodegradable Plastics

As scientists learn more about the impacts of biodegradable plastics, they’re working to design materials that minimize environmental costs. Using tools like LCIA, researchers can adjust physical properties—such as density, degradation rates, and carbon content—so that biodegradable plastics break down with lower greenhouse gas emissions and reduced aquatic toxicity.

LCIA helps scientists make informed design choices that balance eco-friendliness with practicality. For instance, certain plastics might be designed with an optimized Specific Surface Degradation Rate (SSDR), which controls the rate at which they break down in nature. This helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions while ensuring the plastic still decomposes efficiently.

Think of it like a “recipe” for future plastics. Each ingredient—density, degradation rate, carbon content—needs to be carefully balanced to create a plastic that’s both sustainable and functional. Just as a recipe requires precision for the best result, so does the design of biodegradable plastics.

With LCIA as a guide, scientists and manufacturers can develop low-carbon biodegradable plastics that help protect the planet by reducing pollution and managing emissions.

What Can We Do to Make a Difference?

As consumers, we have a role to play in reducing plastic pollution and supporting sustainable materials. Here are some ways we can contribute:

  • Mindful Consumption: Choose products with minimal packaging and support companies that use sustainable materials.

  • Proper Disposal: Make sure biodegradable plastics go into the correct waste streams. Check local composting and recycling guidelines to see if your area has facilities for biodegradable plastics.

  • Spread the Word: Share this information with friends and family. Understanding the pros and cons of biodegradable plastics helps everyone make more informed, eco-friendly choices.

Summing Up

Biodegradable plastics are a promising step toward reducing plastic pollution, but they also come with their own environmental costs, especially when they end up in natural environments. Through Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), scientists help us understand these trade-offs, from reducing microplastic pollution to the hidden impacts of greenhouse gas emissions.

Ultimately, while biodegradable plastics offer benefits, they are only part of the solution. Proper disposal methods, innovative material design, and mindful consumer choices are essential to building a sustainable future for our planet.


Source: Piao, Z., Boakye, A. A. A., & Yao, Y. (2024). Environmental impacts of biodegradable microplastics. Nature Chemical Engineering, 1, 661–669. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44286-024-00127-0?error=cookies_not_supported&code=a4653aa8-de5c-4823-85fb-bc9aab12b51e

How Climate Education for Clinicians Can Make a Difference

Two healthcare professionals in masks forming a heart shape with their hands, holding a small globe within it, emphasizing their commitment to global health under the Quality Incentive Program (QIP)
In a survey of 2417 clinicians at an academic medical center, most found climate change and healthcare sustainability relevant to their practices and reported increased knowledge after completing a Quality Incentive Program (QIP) measure.

Climate change is not just an environmental issue; it’s a health crisis that requires the attention and action of all sectors, including healthcare. A recent study at Massachusetts General Hospital, a leading academic medical center in Boston, has shed light on the power of climate education among healthcare professionals. This innovative approach through a Quality Incentive Program (QIP) highlights how targeted educational efforts can significantly enhance clinicians’ understanding and responsiveness to the health impacts of climate change.

The Power of Education in Healthcare

The QIP focused on educating clinicians about the direct and indirect impacts of climate change on health and healthcare sustainability. The program, involving structured educational video modules, was remarkably successful, with a participation rate of 94.5% among eligible clinicians. This high engagement rate underscores the healthcare community’s recognition of the urgency of the climate crisis.

Key Findings from the Study

  • Increased Knowledge and Awareness: Clinicians reported a significant increase in their knowledge about how climate change affects health. Post-education, most clinicians felt better equipped to address these challenges in their practice, indicating that education can effectively bridge the knowledge gap.
  • Relevance to Clinical Practice: The study revealed that the education was not only relevant but also crucial for clinical practice. Clinicians in specialties directly facing the impacts of climate change found the modules particularly pertinent. This highlights the need for specialty-specific content that addresses the unique challenges and opportunities within different fields of medicine.
  • Positive Shift in Attitudes: The positive reception to the educational modules was evident across various demographics within the healthcare community. Female clinicians and those in climate-facing specialties, such as pulmonology and infectious diseases, expressed a higher appreciation for the relevance of this education, suggesting that personal and professional experiences might influence perceptions of climate education’s importance.
  • Desire for More Action: Clinicians not only learned from the modules but were also motivated to seek further information and take action within their practices. This enthusiasm for more actionable insights points to a growing consensus among healthcare professionals about the role they play in mitigating climate change.

Implications for the Healthcare Sector

The success of the QIP at Massachusetts General Hospital demonstrates that climate education can be seamlessly integrated into professional development for healthcare providers. This approach not only enhances clinicians’ understanding but also empowers them to act. Healthcare institutions worldwide have an opportunity—and a responsibility—to adopt similar programs that educate and engage their staff in sustainability efforts.

Summing Up

The healthcare sector stands in a unique position to influence positive change. By incorporating climate education into regular training and incentive programs, healthcare providers can become pivotal players in advocating for and implementing environmentally sustainable practices. The findings from this study not only highlight the effectiveness of such educational initiatives but also call for a widespread adoption to make a more significant impact.

Call to Action

Healthcare professionals are encouraged to advocate for climate education within their institutions, ensuring that the health impacts of climate change are recognized and addressed in medical training and practice. It’s time to expand the role of healthcare in combating climate change, moving from awareness to action.


Armand, W., Padget, M., Pinsky, E., Wasfy, J. H., Slutzman, J. E., & Duhaime, A.-C. (2024). Clinician knowledge and attitudes about climate change and health after a quality incentive program. JAMA Network Open, 7(8), e2426790.