National Parks at Risk: How Privatization Could Speed Up Climate Change

Yosemite Valley, among the trees.
Yosemite Valley, among the trees, in June 2023. Credit: Diana Bald

America’s national parks are powerful and beautiful. They are scenic vacation spots and part of our shared heritage. They are home to countless wildlife species and natural protectors against climate change. Recently, concerns have grown about privatization—the idea of private companies taking over or managing aspects of our national parks. Why does this matter? Privatization could change how these lands are cared for, possibly speeding up climate change and limiting public access.

Below we’ll share what privatization is, why it’s happening, and how it might put our parks—and our planet—at risk. You’ll learn about potential harm to wildlife and ecosystems and see how private profit-seeking might increase carbon pollution. Finally, we’ll look at the different sides of the debate and share ways you can help protect these treasures for future generations.

What Is National Park Privatization?

Privatization of national parks means involving private companies in running parts of a park—or, in more extreme cases, selling park land. While the second option is very rare and highly controversial, there are other, more common ways private interests can step in.

  • Concessions: This is when private businesses manage hotels, restaurants, campgrounds, or gift shops inside a national park. A company might build and operate a lodge while paying fees to the government.

  • Public-Private Partnerships: The government owns the park but hires or partners with a private operator to handle daily services, like cleaning facilities or running visitor centers.

  • Outright Sale: In uncommon situations, park land could be sold to a private entity, meaning it is no longer publicly owned.

Why It’s Happening

Many parks have significant funding gaps. According to the National Park Service (NPS), national parks in the United States face an estimated $11.9 billion maintenance backlog, meaning there’s a lot of work that needs to be done—like fixing roads, upgrading water systems, and repairing trails—but not enough money to do it all. Some people believe private companies can fill this gap by bringing in their own funds and running things more efficiently.

Why Do People Worry About Privatization?

Privatization sometimes gives private businesses room to push for more development—like building bigger hotels or even introducing commercial activities in delicate areas. This can mean fewer trees to absorb carbon dioxide, more greenhouse gas emissions from construction, and more energy use to support amenities like large resorts (Source: National Parks Conservation Association (NPCA)).

Loss of Public Control

Our national parks belong to all of us. When for-profit companies take a bigger role, everyday citizens can lose their say in how these lands are used. Government agencies like the National Park Service aim to protect wildlife, natural beauty, and our shared heritage. Private companies have a duty to earn profits. These two goals don’t always line up.

Risk of High Prices and Limited Access

Private businesses often raise fees to cover costs and make a profit. That might include higher prices for overnight stays, guided tours, or even basic park entry. Imagine a scenario where only those who can pay premium rates get to enjoy our national treasures. That kind of setup could exclude families on a budget or students looking to learn about nature firsthand.

How Could Privatization Speed Up Climate Change?

Privately built hotels, roads, and resorts can encroach on forests or wetlands that store carbon. Removing trees or filling in wetlands releases carbon that was previously locked away in plants and soil, adding to the greenhouse gases warming our planet.

When privatization weakens environmental protections, there’s a chance that companies will seek permission to mine, drill, or log on public lands near or even within parks. Extracting natural resources not only increases carbon emissions but also disrupts critical habitats for animals and plants.

A private operator looking for higher profits might want to draw large crowds. More visitors can be wonderful for education and appreciation, but it can also mean more cars, heavier traffic, and longer lines, all leading to additional exhaust fumes and higher greenhouse gas emissions.

Harm to Wildlife and Ecosystems

Big developments like roads, fences, or commercial sites can cut wildlife habitats into smaller pieces. When animals can’t move around freely to find food or migrate, their populations may decline. This fragmentation makes ecosystems more fragile and less able to bounce back from natural disasters linked to climate change.

Reduced Biodiversity

National parks often safeguard a vast range of plant and animal species. Overbuilding, pollution, and noise can push away or endanger species—leading to a drop in biodiversity. Healthy ecosystems rely on a balance of predators, prey, and plants. When that balance is lost, the entire system can unravel.

Less Resilient Ecosystems

Forests, wetlands, and grasslands inside parks help lessen the worst impacts of climate change by storing carbon, stabilizing soils, and buffering against floods. If these areas become fragmented or polluted, they can’t protect us as effectively from the rising threats of wildfires, severe storms, or droughts (Source: United Nations Environment Programme).

Different Sides of the Argument

We’re stunned by the concept of loosing national parks that belong to all of us to private ownership of a few. Privatization supporters argue that private companies could bring much-needed funding, potentially fix aging facilities, and even offer new innovations—like using clean energy in park buildings. They also point out that private partnerships might generate jobs for local communities. Critics worry that a focus on profit could weaken conservation efforts, possibly leading to higher entrance fees that shut out families or lower-income visitors. They also warn that private operators may not face the same level of public oversight, which could make environmental regulations harder to enforce.

Arguments For Privatization

  • May bring more money to fix trails, roads, and park facilities.
  • Could create jobs in local communities, especially around tourism.
  • Potential for private innovation, such as using solar power in new building projects if the contract requires it.

Arguments Against Privatization

  • Profit motives overlook long-term conservation and climate goals.
  • Increased fees could limit public access and make visiting too expensive for many people.
  • Less accountability and oversight mean environmental standards may not be enforced strictly.

Actions Concerned Citizens Can Take

You don’t need a science degree or a powerful position to help protect our parks. Here are some ways you can make a difference:

  • Stay Informed
  • Speak Up
    • Contact your elected officials—call, email, or meet them at a town hall—and share your concerns about privatization proposals.
    • Write letters to local newspapers or post on social media to raise awareness.
  • Support Public Funding
    • Advocate for strong public budgets for parks. For instance, the Great American Outdoors Act helps fund maintenance and conservation projects without relying solely on private money.
    • Encourage your community to vote in favor of bond measures or other funding initiatives that keep parks public and well-maintained.
  • Volunteer and Donate
    • Donate to nonprofits dedicated to conservation and biodiversity.
    • Look for volunteer programs in local or national parks, where you can help maintain trails or educate visitors about conservation.

Final Thoughts

National parks belong to everyone. While privatization might seem like a quick fix to budget problems, it can have serious effects on our climate and on the health of these special places. Private operators could prioritize profits over the long-term well-being of wildlife and ecosystems, leading to more carbon emissions and less public involvement.

By staying informed, speaking up, and supporting strong public funding, you can help protect national parks for generations to come. Your voice matters in deciding how these natural wonders should be cared for. With a little effort, we can make sure our parks remain open, wild, and resilient in a changing climate—leaving a healthy legacy for those who come after us.


Sources

August 4th marks three years of the Great American Outdoors Act

Yinan Chen, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Yinan Chen, Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons

A celebration of conservation, economic growth, and recreational opportunities

The Great American Outdoors Act (GAOA) represents a vital investment in the conservation and maintenance of US public lands and Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) schools. Establishing the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund (GAOA LRF) provides a permanent source of funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF), safeguards natural areas and cultural heritage, and addresses overdue maintenance. Since 2021, GAOA has supported 17,000 jobs annually and generated $1.8 billion for local economies.

August 4 marks three-year anniversary

On August 4, the Department of the Interior will celebrate the three-year anniversary of GAOA’s enactment by waiving entrance fees at all department-managed lands. Secretary Deb Haaland highlighted the importance of GAOA in ensuring public lands are safe and accessible while also boosting the economy and preparing infrastructure to combat climate change.

The Great American Outdoors Act ensures that our public lands are safe and accessible for all visitors and staff by investing billions of dollars in infrastructure projects. I was proud to co-sponsor this historic law, which provides critical investments in our public lands to ensure they are ready to meet the challenges of climate change, while boosting the American economy by creating good-paying jobs.

As our public lands continue to meet increased visitation, GAOA complements President Biden’s Investing in America agenda to strengthen our infrastructure and prepare it to meet future needs.

—Secretary Deb Haaland

GAOA LRF is financing deferred maintenance, improving over 2,200 assets across the nation, and enhancing visitor safety and accessibility. The fund also supports Indigenous communities by enhancing BIE-funded schools and creating better learning environments for Indigenous youth.

In addition, GAOA permanently funds the LWCF at $900 million annually, which has already financed $5.2 billion for over 45,000 projects nationwide since 1965.

Celebrate GAOA’s anniversary at one of our National Parks

The National Park Service offers a plethora of outdoor recreational activities and ways to celebrate GAOA’s three-year anniversary. National Parks offer cycling, camping, and hiking, as well as cultural and natural programs including ranger talks and live performances. Many parks also host events such as music, theater, and craft demonstrations. In addition, some parks provide sports facilities for activities like golf, tennis, and running.

GAOA’s contributions are vital to President Biden’s economic agenda, creating good-paying jobs, boosting infrastructure, and fostering resilience against climate change.

Confronting a silent threat as climate change reshapes Yosemite National Park

Yosemite Valley in June 2023
Yosemite Valley in June 2023

We were up at Yosemite National Park this week and noticed that it has changed since our last visit 30 years ago. Yosemite National Park remains majestic. However, it is undeniably experiencing transformations at the expense of climate change. From its cascading waterfalls to the towering sequoias and diverse wildlife, the effects of our changing climate are visible.

Warming rate

Data collected since 1895 reveal that from 1895 to 2016, the area within the park’s boundaries warmed at a rate of 1.6°F per century. This warming rate has more than doubled in recent decades, with the period from 1950 to 2010 seeing a warming rate of 3.4°F per century. Nighttime temperatures in Yosemite Valley have increased faster than average temperatures, rising by 7.6°F from 1915 to 2012. Along with rising temperatures, the park’s frost-free days increased by around 88 days from 1907 to 2012, indicating a longer growing season.

The burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and large-scale farming have resulted in historically high levels of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane. These gases trap heat near Earth’s surface, contributing to global warming.

If greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated, the climate of Yosemite is projected to experience further changes over the next century. Average temperatures in the park could rise by 6.7-10.3°F between 2000 and 2100. The number of days per year with temperatures above 90°F could quadruple, and extreme weather events, including storms that historically broke 20-year precipitation records, may become far more frequent.

Emissions at the park

People love national parks and want to experience their beauty. According to the Yosemite National Park website, modern times have seen an influx of cars into Yosemite Valley. The cumulative distance traveled by visitors within Yosemite is over 80 million miles annually. This traffic not only leads to pollution and congestion but also contributes over 60% of the park’s carbon footprint.

The forests’ silent struggle

Climate change also poses significant threats to Yosemite’s sequoia trees. The warmer climate exacerbates drought conditions and increases the frequency and intensity of wildfires, both of which can stress these ancient giants.

Last year alone, in 2022, Yosemite was impacted by four significant fires. In July 2022, the Washburn Fire threatened the giant sequoias of Mariposa Grove, including the beloved Grizzly Giant, and in that same month fire officials evacuated over 6,000 people Yosemite area during the Oak Fire. One month later, in August 2022, the Red Fire burned 8,410 acres in Yosemite National Park as part of the 2022 California wildfire season.

Moreover, changing conditions are affecting the broader forest ecosystem. Rising temperatures, coupled with increased pest outbreaks, such as the pine beetle infestation, are leading to higher mortality rates among tree species. This alteration in forest composition can fundamentally transform the habitat, impacting numerous species that call Yosemite home.

Vanishing glaciers

Lyell Glacier, the largest in Yosemite, has shrunk by nearly 80% in the past century. As our planet continues to warm, glaciers in the park are predicted to disappear entirely. Glacial melt not only contributes to sea-level rise globally, but it also influences the park’s water supply, impacting both the natural habitats and human usage.

Wildlife impact

Yosemite’s rich biodiversity, from the smallest insects to the largest mammals, is also affected. Species are forced to shift their ranges to higher altitudes in search of cooler temperatures, disrupting the existing ecological balance. Some, like the pika, a small mammal adapted to the cold alpine environment, are running out of room to move higher and are at risk of local extinction.

Waterfall in Yosemite National Park, June 2023
Waterfall in Yosemite National Park, June 2023

Mission to conserve and project

In 1916, through the Organic Act, the National Park Service was created with the mandate of protecting national parks for future generations:

“….to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wildlife therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.”

The park has mobilized its resources toward confronting climate change. Scientists from various fields work to understand the changes we witness. Their findings are shared with the public through guided programs and activities, raising awareness and prompting individual action. With around four to five million visitors annually, Yosemite is uniquely positioned to shape the narrative around global change.

Reducing carbon footprint from transportation

To reduce the carbon footprint from transportation, park managers have implemented shuttle and bus services, reducing emissions and easing traffic.

A long-standing partnership with the Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System (YARTS) provides services to and from communities around the park. Within Yosemite, free shuttles transport visitors to various destinations. As of 2020, 24 of these vehicles were diesel-electric hybrids, and two were fully electric.

Waste management

Yosemite generates over 6,200 tons of waste yearly. This waste must be transported to landfills, contributing to carbon emissions. To offset this, Yosemite recycles almost 980 tons of various materials annually, saving over 2,800 metric tons of CO2 from being released into the atmosphere. Furthermore, the park is involved in the Zero Landfill Initiative to improve trash and recycling infrastructure and education.

Green power

To decrease its carbon footprint, Yosemite installed several solar panels at the El Portal Maintenance Complex in 2010. The panels generate over 670,000 kWh of energy annually, preventing over 6,600 metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions since their installation.

Yosemite Valley, among the trees, in June 2023
Yosemite Valley, among the trees, in June 2023

The park needs our help

Although the park devotes significant resources to climate mitigation, in the context of significant environmental changes, this task becomes more challenging and the parks need help from all of us.

Efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions at the individual, community, national, and global levels are crucial. Sustainable practices, renewable energy, and energy-efficient technologies can play significant roles in this transition.

Learn about nature and park protection

Rangers and park partners offer visitors opportunities to learn about nature and park protection. They leverage their understanding and engage in conversations about the meaning of change in public lands. They help visitors appreciate the profound impacts of climate change, reinforcing the need for collective action.

Volunteer

Volunteer with the Yosemite National Park Service or a National Park near you to help improve and maintain trails in Yosemite Valley or your national park. Volunteering offers you the opportunity to connect with nature and enjoy the vistas, gorgeous trees, and granite walls, as you restore fragile natural resources damaged by visitors. 

It is our profound hope that we act together to protect our beautiful planet and our national parks. Let’s co-create a legacy of care, conservation, and protection for future generations.