Tackling the Methane Challenge: Critical Moves to Cool the Planet

Methane CH4.
Methane CH4. Credit: Christinelmiller, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons


Methane (CH4) is a potent but often overlooked contributor to climate change that needs mitigation.

A new study, “The Methane Imperative,” published in Frontiers in Science, shifts the spotlight from CO2 to methane (CH4), a potent but often overlooked contributor to climate change.

The Growing Threat of Methane

Methane emissions have been rising sharply, particularly since 2006, driven predominantly by activities in wetlands and the fossil fuel industry. The study emphasizes that methane is responsible for nearly as much global warming as CO2, making its control crucial for limiting global temperature rises to 1.5°C or 2°C. If unchecked, rising methane levels threaten to undermine efforts to reach net-zero carbon targets, underscoring the urgency for immediate action.

Cost-effective Mitigation Strategies

The research highlights several methane mitigation strategies that are not only effective but also economically viable. By comparing the costs of these strategies with the financial damages caused by methane-related warming, the study makes a compelling case for robust, legally binding regulations to promote their adoption. These strategies include:

  • Implement Strong Regulations: Enforce legally binding measures to ensure that methane reduction targets are met.

  • Introduce Methane Pricing: Establish mechanisms that reflect the environmental cost of methane emissions, incentivizing reductions.

  • Expand Technological Solutions: Invest in advanced technologies to capture and convert methane, particularly in the oil, gas, and waste sectors.

  • Enhance Monitoring Systems: Use satellite and ground-based tools to track methane emissions accurately and identify major emission sources.

  • Promote Sector-Specific Policies: Develop policies tailored to the primary methane sources in each sector, ensuring efficient mitigation.

  • Encourage International Collaboration: Foster global partnerships to share technologies, best practices, and resources for methane mitigation.

  • Educate Stakeholders: Raise awareness among governments, businesses, and the public about methane’s role in climate change and the benefits of its reduction.

Methane and CO2 Reduction: An Interconnected Approach

One of the key insights from the study is the interconnectedness of methane and CO2 reduction efforts. Strategies that target methane emissions can significantly aid in achieving net-zero CO2 goals through mechanisms like bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and afforestation. However, these strategies often require extensive land use, which could be optimized by reducing methane emissions from agricultural sources, particularly livestock.

Health and Economic Benefits of Methane Reduction

Reducing methane emissions not only helps mitigate global warming but also offers considerable health benefits. The study points out that lowering methane levels can significantly reduce surface ozone pollution, which affects respiratory health and crop yields. Furthermore, the economic benefits of addressing methane emissions include avoiding substantial costs associated with climate-related damages, enhancing the overall cost-effectiveness of methane reduction strategies.

Global and National Actions

“The Methane Imperative” calls for global cooperation and the implementation of national policies tailored to specific methane sources. These policies should be designed to leverage the unique economic and environmental contexts of each country, ensuring that methane reduction efforts are both effective and sustainable.

Summing Up

Methane may be less discussed than CO2, but its impact on global warming is substantial and undeniable. As the study suggests, targeted methane reduction is an essential component of the broader climate mitigation agenda. By adopting comprehensive strategies that address both CO2 and methane, the world can make significant strides towards the ambitious but crucial goal of limiting global warming.


Source: Shindell, D., Sadavarte, P., Aben, I., Bredariol, T. d. O., Dreyfus, G., Höglund-Isaksson, L., … & Maasakkers, J. D. (2024). The methane imperative. Frontiers in Science, 2, 1349770.

How Reforestation in the Eastern United States Combats Climate Change: A Century’s Insight

Borley wood - restoration This view shows a area from which planted exotic conifer species have just been removed to allow site native species to re-assert themselves (NVC W8 ash/maple woodland type), October 17, 2006.
Borley wood – restoration This view shows a area from which planted exotic conifer species have just been removed to allow site native species to re-assert themselves (NVC W8 ash/maple woodland type), October 17, 2006.

  

A recent study “A Century of Reforestation Reduced Anthropogenic Warming in the Eastern United States” unveils a silver lining through the lens of historical reforestation efforts in the Eastern United States. Spanning over a century, these endeavors have contributed to the greening of landscapes and played a pivotal role in reducing anthropogenic warming across the region. This study revealed the significant impact of reforestation on local climate mitigation and underscores the potential of nature-based solutions in our fight against global warming.

The Cooling Effect of Reforestation

The research, conducted by a team of environmental scientists, reveals that reforestation in the Eastern U.S. has led to a noticeable cooling of both land surface and near-surface air temperatures. By analyzing ground and satellite-based observations, the study highlights a significant reduction in temperatures, with forests cooling the land surface by 1–2°C annually compared to adjacent grasslands and croplands. This cooling effect is most pronounced during the growing season’s midday, offering a natural buffer against the rising temperatures associated with climate change.

A Shift in Climate Trends

Interestingly, the study correlates the extensive reforestation efforts with the anomalous lack of warming in the Eastern U.S. throughout the 20th century. Unlike other North American regions that experienced substantial warming, the Eastern U.S. showed minor cooling trends, attributed to the biophysical impacts of reforestation. This phenomenon, often referred to as the “warming hole,” underscores the potential of strategic reforestation efforts in tempering regional climate trends.

Implications for Climate Adaptation

The findings of this study underscore reforestation’s dual benefits: sequestering carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and directly cooling the Earth’s surface. In the face of escalating climate change, reforestation emerges as a vital nature-based solution, offering a sustainable pathway for climate adaptation and mitigation. The study’s insights highlight the importance of preserving and expanding forested areas as a proactive measure against global warming.

Renewed Focus on Reforestation & Conservation

As we move forward, the study calls for a renewed focus on reforestation and forest conservation as key strategies in the global climate action agenda. By learning from the century-long reforestation efforts in the Eastern U.S., we can harness the power of nature to forge a cooler, more sustainable future for our planet.

The study provides compelling evidence of reforestation’s positive impact on climate. It serves as a call to action for policymakers, environmentalists, and communities worldwide to invest in reforestation as a practical and impactful climate solution.

More than 100 CEO Climate Leaders share an open letter for world leaders at COP27



  • The Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders shares an open letter for world leaders at COP27.

  • Alliance members know that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius requires significant collaboration and shared responsibility between the private and public sectors.

  • Knowing this, the CEOs are ready to work side by side with governments to accelerate the transition to net zero.

More than 100 CEOs of large multinational organizations, all members of the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, have strong convictions that our ambitious climate targets can be realized only with the support of governments.

We recognize the positive progress to date. Emissions under current policies are projected to reach 58 GtCO2e in 2030, 2 GtCO2e lower than what it was in 2019, but still 25 GtCO2e higher than what is essential to limit warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. This gap is equivalent to the annual emissions of 5.4 billion cars. Unfortunately, assuming full implementation of unconditional NDCs still results in a 23 GtCO2e gap (2019 and 2022 UNEP Emissions Gap Report). Governments must raise their ambitions and enact policy changes to close this gap, otherwise we face a significant threat to the existence of human life and nature.

This letter outlines the actions we believe governments and businesses need to take to unlock the potential of the private sector and to move towards a path that limits global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

We’re in this together to solve the climate crisis

We, the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, are ready to work side-by-side with governments to deliver bold climate action. We encourage all business leaders to set science-based targets to halve global emissions by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 at the latest.

The global impact on food and energy prices, notably due to the war in Ukraine, continues to hurt households, businesses and economies worldwide. The crisis is a stark reminder of the fragile nature of the current energy and food systems, which are still dominated by fossil fuels. Leaders at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP27) have the chance to make this a historic turning point towards cleaner, more affordable and secure energy and food systems. We, therefore, welcome Egypt’s hosting of COP27 this year and Africa’s leadership on climate action, adaptation, resilience and a just transition.

Accelerating the transition to net zero requires significant collaboration and shared responsibility between the private and public sectors. We believe that business commitments to climate action backed by private sector actions and investments can reinforce the mandate for governments to raise their own ambitions and enable faster progress.Government targets, supporting policies and transition plans can provide clarity, predictability and the competitive landscape to encourage more businesses to take action and to make transition-aligned investments.

As members of the Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders, we have committed to reducing emissions by more than 1 gigatons annually by 2030 and have, on average, reduced scope 1 and 2 emissions by 22% from 2019-2020 levels, outpacing major nations.*

We call on our peers in the private sector to join us in:

  • Setting science-based targets in line with the Paris Agreement, with a clear roadmap that takes sector-specific pathways into account.

  • Collaborating within and across sectors and value chains to drive transparency, advocacy and action in alliances and initiatives while working with major industry and trade associations to advance alignment with the Paris Agreement.

  • Contributing to the development of internationally harmonized reporting standards.

In this context and with leaders meeting at COP27 and the G20, we call on governments to:

Set bold ambitions and follow through on commitments

Deliver on the promise in the Glasgow Climate Pact and commit to ambitious and Paris Agreement-aligned nationally determined contributions and translate them into plans and policies that at least halve global carbon emissions by 2030 and contribute to global net zero by 2050.

Accelerate the transition

Drive down the green premium of low-carbon technologies for hard-to-abate sectors by unlocking blended finance (concessionary lending, guarantee mechanisms and others), scaling innovative sustainable finance mechanisms, integrating climate and sustainability criteria in public procurement and promoting the alignment of international standards for transformational technologies.

The focus is on action. Recognizing that many solutions already exist, there is an urgent need to:

  • Break down barriers by simplifying regulations, speeding up permitting processes and creating the enabling policy frameworks to accelerate scaling and deploying these solutions. Essential to progress is increased R&D expenditure and the inclusion of digital and physical infrastructure to ensure supply meets demand.

  • Provide incentives, including policies for emerging renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies on both the supply and the demand side, while also supporting hard-to-abate sectors through additional funding for innovation and the scaling up of new solutions, including circularity, carbon removal and natural climate solutions.

  • Put a price on carbon and phase out fossil fuel subsidies in a way that is both just and results in their eventual elimination. Combined, this will improve the competitiveness of sustainable low-carbon technologies.

  • Invest in reskilling and upskilling of those in the workforce that are impacted by the transition and enable more people to participate in the green economy.

Invest in mitigation, adaptation, and a just transition

Ensure that developed countries meet and exceed their $100 billion commitment and that these funds go directly to supporting developing countries’ efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change. This is fundamental to establishing and maintaining confidence between countries to tackle the climate crisis together.

The impacts of climate change are already being felt, from more frequent heatwaves and wildfires to more severe tropical cyclones and floods. These changes disproportionately impact developing countries and threaten current and future economic development, human health and welfare. For new climate adaptation infrastructure projects, governments should strive for a conditionality of sustainability (e.g. building materials and techniques). Investing in water, healthy food systems and resilient supply chains while increasing local production in the Global South using regenerative agriculture and other sustainable farming and food production practices is integral to climate adaptation and resilience.

This must be done while protecting biodiversity and ecosystems and ensuring a fair and inclusive transition for all. This transition needs a radical rethinking of how we do business and a prolonged focus throughout the private and public sectors aligned with bold policy actions to decarbonize the economy.

Internationally harmonize reporting and disclosure standards

With the current divergence of standards underway, we call on the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), the European Commission, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and all other regulating bodies to align their collective efforts to arrive at globally-aligned standards to accurately measure and compare progress against ambitious targetsThe standards must be interoperable, decision-useful and implementable to ensure they create trust and lasting change. Finally, market-based instruments (including carbon markets, power purchase agreements, etc.) have an essential role to play in reducing carbon emissions globally but need greater alignment and clear standards and frameworks.

This is the decade of action, so we must work side-by-side with governments to scale up public-private efforts in the drive to net zero. Alliance members will be in Egypt during COP27 to discuss with world leaders, government officials and civil society representatives how, together, we can take positive action to tackle the climate crisis.

Signatories

1. Søren Skou, Chief Executive Officer, A.P. Møller-Maersk

2. Björn Rosengren, President and Chief Executive Officer, ABB

3. Julie Sweet, Chief Executive Officer, Accenture

4. Oliver Bäte, Chief Executive Officer, Allianz

5. Hakan Bulgurlu, Chief Executive Officer, Arçelik

6. Alan Belfield, Chair, Arup Group

7. Pascal Soriot, Chief Executive Officer, AstraZeneca Plc

8. Peter Herweck, Chief Executive Officer, AVEVA Group Plc

9. Thomas Buberl, Chief Executive Officer, AXA

10. Manny Maceda, Worldwide Managing Partner, Bain & Company

11. Ana Botín, Group Executive Chairman, Banco Santander

12. Werner Baumann, Chairman of the Board of Management, Bayer AG

13. Carlos Torres Vila, Chair, BBVA

14. Peter T. Grauer, Chairman, Bloomberg LP

15. Rich Lesser, Global Chair, Boston Consulting Group; Chief Advisor, Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders

16. Christoph Schweizer, Chief Executive Officer, Boston Consulting Group

17. Aiman Ezzat, Chief Executive Officer, Capgemini

18. Cees ‘t Hart, Chief Executive Officer, Carlsberg Group

19. Zoran Bogdanovic, Chief Executive Officer, Coca-Cola HBC AG

20. Kim Fausing, President and Chief Executive Officer, Danfoss A/S

21. Michael Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Dell Technologies

22. Punit Renjen, Chief Executive Officer, Deloitte Global

23. Christian Sewing, Chief Executive Officer, Deutsche Bank AG

24. Frank Appel, Chief Executive Officer, Deutsche Post DHL Group

25. Christophe Beck, Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Ecolab

26. Coen van Oostrom, Chief Executive Officer, Edge

27. Francesco Starace, Chief Executive Officer and General Manager, Enel

28. Catherine MacGregor, Chief Executive Officer, ENGIE

29. Zhang Lei, Chief Executive Officer, Envision Group

30. Christian Sinding, CEO and Managing Partner, EQT

31. Börje Ekholm, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ericsson

32. Carmine Di Sibio, Global Chairman and CEO, EY

33. Revathi Advaithi, Chief Executive Officer, Flex

34. Stefan Klebert, Chief Executive Officer, GEA Group

35. Poul Due Jensen, Chief Executive Officer, Grundfos

36. Helena Helmersson, Chief Executive Officer, H&M Group

37. Dolf van den Brink, Chief Executive Officer, HEINEKEN NV

38. Carsten Knobel, Chief Executive Officer, Henkel

39. Stanley M. Bergman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Henry Schein Inc.

40. Antonio Neri, President and Chief Executive Officer, Hewlett Packard Enterprise

41. Jan Jenisch, Chief Executive Officer, Holcim

42. Enrique Lores, President and Chief Executive Officer, HP Inc.

43. Noel Quinn, Group Chief Executive, HSBC

44. Ignacio Galán, Executive Chairman, Iberdrola

45. Pablo Isla, Executive Chairman, Inditex

46. Aloke Lohia, Group Chief Executive Officer, Indorama Ventures

47. Salil S. Parekh, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Infosys Limited

48. Steven van Rijswijk, Chief Executive Officer, ING

49. Jesper Brodin, Chief Executive Officer, Ingka Group I IKEA; Co-Chair, Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders

50. Christian Ulbrich, Global Chief Executive Officer and President, JLL

51. George Oliver, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Johnson Controls

52. Alex Liu, Managing Partner and Chairman of the Board, Kearney

53. Bill Thomas, Global Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, KPMG

54. Tex Gunning, Chief Executive Officer, LeasePlan Corporation N.V.

55. Niels B. Christiansen, Chief Executive Officer & President, LEGO Group

56. Hak Cheol Shin, Chief Executive Officer, LG Chem Ltd

57. H.S.H. Prince Max von und zu Liechtenstein, Chairman, LGT

58. Dr. Anish Shah, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Mahindra Group

59. Alain Bejjani, Chief Executive Officer, Majid Al Futtaim Holding

60. Jonas Prising, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, ManpowerGroup

61. Bob Sternfels, Global Managing Partner, McKinsey & Company

62. Brad Smith, Vice Chair and President, Microsoft

63. James Harris, Executive Chair, Mott MacDonald

64. Mark Schneider, Chief Executive Officer, Nestlé

65. Tom Palmer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Newmont

66. David Knibbe, Chief Executive Officer, NN Group

67. Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen, President and Chief Executive Officer, Novo Nordisk

68. Ester Baiget, President and Chief Executive Officer, Novozymes

69. Philippe Knoche, Chief Executive Officer, Orano

70. Mads Nipper, Group President and CEO, Ørsted

71. Nikesh Arora, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Palo Alto Networks

72. Sumant Sinha, Chairman and CEO, ReNew Energy Global Plc.

73. Torben Möger Pedersen, Chief Executive Officer, PensionDanmark

74. Ramon Laguarta, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, PepsiCo

75. Robert E. Moritz, Global Chairman, PwC

76. Stefan Schaible, Global Managing Partner, Roland Berger

77. Dimitri de Vreeze, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Managing Board Member, Royal DSM

78. Feike Sybesma, Honorary Chairman, Royal DSM; Founder and Co-Chair, Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders

79. Marc Benioff, Chair and Co-Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce

80. Roy Jakobs, Chief Executive Officer, Royal Philips

81. Christian Levin, President and Chief Executive Officer, Scania CV AB

82. Jean-Pascal Tricoire, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Schneider Electric

83. Christian Klein, Chief Executive Officer and Member of the Executive Board, SAP SE

84. Roland Busch, President and Chief Executive Officer, Siemens AG

85. Eric Rondolat, Chief Executive Officer, Signify

86. Ilham Kadri, Chief Executive Officer, Solvay

87. Kenichiro Yoshida, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Sony Group Corporation

88. Bill Winters, Group Chief Executive, Standard Chartered Bank

89. Takeshi Niinami, Chief Executive Officer, Suntory Holdings

90. Walter Schalka, Chief Executive Officer, Suzano S.A.

91. Christian Mumenthaler, Group Chief Executive Officer, Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd; Co-Chair, Alliance of CEO Climate Leaders

92. Erik Fyrwald, Chief Executive Officer, Syngenta Group

93. Kevin Hourican, President and Chief Executive Officer, Sysco

94. David S. Regnery, Chief Executive Officer, Trane Technologies

95. Alan Jope, Chief Executive Officer, Unilever

96. Henrik Andersen, President and Chief Executive Officer, Vestas Wind Systems

97. Martin Lundstedt, President and Chief Executive Officer, Volvo Group

98. Thierry Delaporte, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, Wipro Limited

99. Svein Tore Holsether, President and Chief Executive Officer, Yara International ASA

100. Wolf-Henning Scheider, Chairman of the Board of Management and Chief Executive Officer, ZF Group

101. Mario Greco, Group Chief Executive Officer, Zurich Insurance Group

*Such as Brazil (13% 2019-2020 reduction), USA (11% 2019-2020 reduction), Europe and India (both 8% 19-20 reduction), all taken from the Carbon Monitor Programme, Nature.com analysis.

Original source: World Economic Forum (Public License)