How Climate Change Is Affecting Your Favorite Healthy Food Choices

January 12, 2025 / activist360

Close-up of red apples in a basket. The apples Have natural variations in color and texture, showcasing a mix of reddish hues and green patches. Some of the apples have visible blemishes, reflecting their organic and unprocessed state. The lighting is soft and warm, highlighting the rustic and fresh appeal of the apples. Photo by Priscilla Du Preez 🇨🇦 on Unsplash.

Did you know that the apples you enjoy might soon face serious challenges because of rising temperatures?

Apples, one of the most beloved and healthiest snacks, are under threat. As climate change reshapes weather patterns, it’s also impacting how—and where—our food grows. These changes affect not just apples but many of the healthy foods we rely on every day. Understanding this issue is crucial for anyone who cares about their health and the environment. Let’s dive into how climate change is affecting your food.

The Science Behind the Problem

How Climate Change Impacts Agriculture

Climate change is causing shifts in temperatures, rainfall, and weather patterns worldwide. For agriculture, this means disrupted growing cycles, extreme heat, and unpredictable frosts—all of which create challenges for crops. Perennial crops like apples are particularly vulnerable because their growth depends on consistent weather conditions year-round.

Apples as a Case Study

Apples provide a clear example of how climate change affects food production. Scientists have identified six key climate factors that influence apple growth, including:

Extreme Heat Days: Days when temperatures exceed 93°F can cause sunburn on apple skins, reducing their quality.
Warm Nights: Nighttime temperatures above 59°F can prevent apples from developing their rich red color, making them less appealing to consumers.
Reduced Chill Portions: Apples need cold periods during winter to rest and prepare for spring growth. Warmer winters mean fewer of these essential chill hours.
Earlier Frost-Free Days: While this might sound good, it can disrupt the natural bloom cycle, increasing the risk of frost damage later.

Yakima County in Washington, one of the leading apple-producing regions in the U.S., has seen harmful trends in five of these six metrics. These changes reduce apple yield, size, color, and taste—qualities that make apples a staple in healthy diets.

Why It Matters to You

Health Implications

Changes in food production can directly impact your diet. When apples face extreme heat or warm nights, they may lose their flavor and nutritional value. Reduced availability of high-quality apples could make healthy eating more expensive or harder to achieve.

Environmental Concerns

When crops like apples struggle, farmers must use more resources to maintain production. This includes water for cooling trees during heatwaves or energy to run protective equipment. These added measures can increase the carbon footprint of growing food, contributing further to climate change—a cycle that’s tough to break.

Actions Being Taken

Adaptation by Farmers

Farmers are already finding ways to adapt. Here are some strategies being used:

Netting: Covers are placed over apple orchards to protect fruit from sunburn.
Evaporative Cooling: Spraying water on trees helps lower their temperature during heatwaves.
Crop Diversification: Planting heat-resistant apple varieties or other crops reduces risk.

Scientific Research and Innovation

Researchers are also stepping in. A $6.75 million USDA-funded project is helping farmers mitigate extreme climate events. This initiative includes studying how to adapt apples and pears to new growing conditions across the U.S., starting with Washington State. Scientists are working to find long-term solutions that keep crops productive despite challenging conditions.

How You Can Help

Support Sustainable Practices: When you buy apples and other produce, look for labels that indicate sustainable farming practices. Supporting local farmers who prioritize environmentally friendly methods can make a big difference.
Reduce Food Waste: Every piece of wasted food represents water, energy, and labor lost. By planning meals carefully and storing apples properly, you can reduce waste and lessen the strain on farmers already coping with climate challenges.
Advocate for Change: You don’t have to be a farmer to make a difference. Get involved in climate-friendly initiatives or share this information with others. Raising awareness about how climate change affects food can inspire collective action and support for sustainable practices.

Summing Up

Climate change is reshaping how and where our food is grown, with apples as just one example of a crop under threat. The impacts go beyond the farm, influencing your health, your wallet, and the environment. But there’s hope—farmers, scientists, and consumers can work together to protect our environment and food supply.

Source: Preston, S., Rajagopalan, K., Yourek, M., Kalcsits, L., & Singh, D. (2024). Changing climate risks for high-value tree fruit production across the United States. Environmental Research Letters, 19(12), 124092. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad90f4

Reject Regression: Advocate for Bold Climate Action Against Project 2025’s Harmful Proposals

July 7, 2024 / activist360

Warning: Project 2025 accelerates climate change! Vote Biden. Vote Blue.

Warning: Project 2025 accelerates climate change! Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025. Vote Biden. Vote Blue.

As the world grapples with the escalating impacts of climate change, urgent and decisive action is needed. However, Project 2025 proposes reforms that significantly undermine critical environmental protections and sustainable development efforts. These reforms threaten to derail progress on combating climate change, protecting public health, and ensuring environmental sustainability. These policies are regressive and dangerous. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025. Vote Biden. Vote Blue.

Energy Policy: Prioritizing Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Future

The proposed energy policy in Project 2025 advocates for an “all of the above” approach, emphasizing the continued use of fossil fuels while criticizing renewable energy initiatives. This perspective overlooks the urgent need to transition to cleaner energy sources to combat climate change. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Renewable energy and sustainability are imperative for ensuring long-term energy security. Prioritizing clean energy technologies like wind, solar, and advanced nuclear power can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create jobs, and enhance energy independence. Policies should support renewable energy subsidies and climate initiatives that drive innovation and reduce our carbon footprint.

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), renewable energy could, and should, account for 90% of the power sector’s decarbonization by 2050, creating millions of jobs and enhancing energy independence. Policies should support renewable energy subsidies, research and development in clean technologies, and the implementation of carbon pricing mechanisms to incentivize reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental Protection: Strengthening the EPA’s Role

Project 2025 aims to eliminate climate change initiatives within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), criticizing them as economically burdensome. This perspective ignores the critical role that climate policies play in safeguarding public health and the environment. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Climate change initiatives are vital for long-term environmental sustainability. The EPA’s focus on renewable energy and stringent air quality standards ensures cleaner air, reduces health risks, and mitigates the impacts of climate change. Rather than eliminating these initiatives, we should strengthen the EPA’s capacity to enforce science-based regulations that protect both the environment and public health.

Health and Climate Change: Integrating Environmental Considerations

Project 2025 suggested for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) largely ignore the connections between public health and climate change. This oversight will result in dangerously inadequate preparation and response to health crises worsened by climate conditions. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Public health policies need to incorporate the impacts of climate change, which include increased heat-related illnesses, respiratory issues from air pollution, and the spread of climate-sensitive diseases. A robust public health system that addresses these challenges is crucial for building resilient communities. Policies should promote environmental health and prepare for the health impacts of a changing climate.

Agriculture and Water: Sustainable Practices for Long-Term Resilience

Project 2025 will downplay agricultural and water policies, focusing on deregulation and short-term economic gains. This approach leads to accelerated environmental degradation and resource depletion. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Sustainable agriculture and water management practices are essential for long-term resilience and our health! Policies should support conservation programs, promote water-efficient technologies, and encourage sustainable farming practices. Investing in sustainable agriculture ensures food security, protects natural resources, and mitigates the impacts of climate change on our ecosystems.

Housing and Urban Development: Building Green Communities

Project 2025 reverses climate change initiatives within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) threatening to halt progress on sustainable urban development. Ignoring climate considerations in housing policies leads to higher energy costs and increased emissions. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Climate change initiatives in housing are crucial for promoting energy-efficient buildings and sustainable urban planning. Policies should incentivize green construction, support renewable energy integration, and ensure that urban development is resilient to climate impacts. Sustainable housing reduces energy costs, lowers emissions, and improves the quality of life in communities.

Summing Up

Project 2025 presents a regressive approach to climate policy, favoring short-term economic gains for a few over long-term sustainability. This perspective is not only shortsighted but also dangerous, as it undermines efforts to combat climate change and protect public health and the environment. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

We must advocate for policies that prioritize renewable energy, strengthen environmental protections, integrate climate considerations into public health, promote sustainable agriculture, and build green communities. By embracing a comprehensive approach to climate action, we can ensure a sustainable and resilient future for generations to come.

Our planet is at a critical juncture. We must reject proposals that roll back environmental progress and instead champion policies that foster innovation, equity, and sustainability. The climate crisis demands bold and immediate action. By committing to protecting our environment and securing a healthy, prosperous future for all, we can rise to the challenge and create a legacy of resilience and sustainability.

Vote Biden. Vote Blue.

Vote Biden. Vote Blue. They champion comprehensive and forward-thinking climate policies which are crucial for our future, health, and sustainability of our children and future generations. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Insights into the Thirst of the Southwest

March 31, 2024 / activist360

Colorado River as it meanders south towards the Grand Canyon, taken near to Horse Shoe Bend AZ. Source: herdiephoto, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Insights from a New Comprehensive Water Accounting Study

The Colorado River, a lifeline for over 40 million people and over two million hectares of cropland, barely trickles into the Gulf of California’s shores. The river has reached a critical juncture due to decades of overuse and climate challenges.

A new study published in Nature provides a comprehensive water budget, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of water consumption and offering a roadmap toward sustainable management. The river’s dwindling flows underscore a pressing need for strategic interventions to ensure its survival and continued support for millions of people and vast agricultural lands.

The Heart of the Matter

The multi-year study conducted between 2000 and 2019, provides a granular analysis of water usage patterns, pinpointing agriculture as the dominant consumer. The findings indicate that irrigated agriculture accounts for a staggering 74% of direct human water use, with cattle feed crops such as alfalfa and grass as significant water guzzlers, accounting for 46% of direct water consumption.

Water consumed by each sector in the Colorado River Basin and sub-basins (including exports), based on 2000–2019 averages from the study New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea (Fig. 4).

The Colorado River’s Dilemma

The Colorado River’s plight tells a tale of natural variability alongside a stark reflection of human choices and their impacts on natural resources. The study’s revelations about the scale of agricultural water use, especially for cattle feed, invite a critical reassessment of water allocation priorities and the sustainability of current agricultural practices.

Navigating the Waters Ahead

Addressing the Colorado River’s challenges requires a multifaceted approach, combining policy reforms, technological innovations, and shifts in agricultural practices. The study advocates for a balanced water budget and the adoption of water-efficient technologies and crops.

With cattle feed crops utilizing a considerable portion of the river’s water, the study suggests reevaluating crop choices and water use efficiency. Implementing more sustainable practices, including alternative cropping patterns and enhanced irrigation techniques, could substantially reduce water stress. Moreover, it underscores the importance of collaborative water management strategies involving all stakeholders to ensure equitable and sustainable use.

Final Thoughts

The Colorado River’s diminishing flows serve as a wake-up call to address the unsustainable patterns of water consumption that threaten this critical water source. The comprehensive study lays the groundwork for informed decision-making, urging immediate action to safeguard the river’s future. Through collective efforts and sustainable practices, there is hope for restoring the balance and ensuring the Colorado River continues to sustain the Southwest for future generations.

Source: Richter, B.D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L. et al. New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Commun Earth Environ 5, 134 (2024).