Reject Regression: Advocate for Bold Climate Action Against Project 2025’s Harmful Proposals

/ activist360
Warning: Project 2025 accelerates climate change! Vote Biden. Vote Blue.
Warning: Project 2025 accelerates climate change! Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025. Vote Biden. Vote Blue.


As the world grapples with the escalating impacts of climate change, urgent and decisive action is needed. However, Project 2025 proposes reforms that significantly undermine critical environmental protections and sustainable development efforts. These reforms threaten to derail progress on combating climate change, protecting public health, and ensuring environmental sustainability. These policies are regressive and dangerous. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025. Vote Biden. Vote Blue.

Energy Policy: Prioritizing Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Future

The proposed energy policy in Project 2025 advocates for an “all of the above” approach, emphasizing the continued use of fossil fuels while criticizing renewable energy initiatives. This perspective overlooks the urgent need to transition to cleaner energy sources to combat climate change. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Renewable energy and sustainability are imperative for ensuring long-term energy security. Prioritizing clean energy technologies like wind, solar, and advanced nuclear power can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create jobs, and enhance energy independence. Policies should support renewable energy subsidies and climate initiatives that drive innovation and reduce our carbon footprint.

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), renewable energy could, and should, account for 90% of the power sector’s decarbonization by 2050, creating millions of jobs and enhancing energy independence. Policies should support renewable energy subsidies, research and development in clean technologies, and the implementation of carbon pricing mechanisms to incentivize reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental Protection: Strengthening the EPA’s Role

Project 2025 aims to eliminate climate change initiatives within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), criticizing them as economically burdensome. This perspective ignores the critical role that climate policies play in safeguarding public health and the environment. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Climate change initiatives are vital for long-term environmental sustainability. The EPA’s focus on renewable energy and stringent air quality standards ensures cleaner air, reduces health risks, and mitigates the impacts of climate change. Rather than eliminating these initiatives, we should strengthen the EPA’s capacity to enforce science-based regulations that protect both the environment and public health.

Health and Climate Change: Integrating Environmental Considerations

Project 2025 suggested for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) largely ignore the connections between public health and climate change. This oversight will result in dangerously inadequate preparation and response to health crises worsened by climate conditions. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Public health policies need to incorporate the impacts of climate change, which include increased heat-related illnesses, respiratory issues from air pollution, and the spread of climate-sensitive diseases. A robust public health system that addresses these challenges is crucial for building resilient communities. Policies should promote environmental health and prepare for the health impacts of a changing climate.

Agriculture and Water: Sustainable Practices for Long-Term Resilience

Project 2025 will downplay agricultural and water policies, focusing on deregulation and short-term economic gains. This approach leads to accelerated environmental degradation and resource depletion. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Sustainable agriculture and water management practices are essential for long-term resilience and our health! Policies should support conservation programs, promote water-efficient technologies, and encourage sustainable farming practices. Investing in sustainable agriculture ensures food security, protects natural resources, and mitigates the impacts of climate change on our ecosystems.

Housing and Urban Development: Building Green Communities

Project 2025 reverses climate change initiatives within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) threatening to halt progress on sustainable urban development. Ignoring climate considerations in housing policies leads to higher energy costs and increased emissions. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Climate change initiatives in housing are crucial for promoting energy-efficient buildings and sustainable urban planning. Policies should incentivize green construction, support renewable energy integration, and ensure that urban development is resilient to climate impacts. Sustainable housing reduces energy costs, lowers emissions, and improves the quality of life in communities.

Summing Up

Project 2025 presents a regressive approach to climate policy, favoring short-term economic gains for a few over long-term sustainability. This perspective is not only shortsighted but also dangerous, as it undermines efforts to combat climate change and protect public health and the environment. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

We must advocate for policies that prioritize renewable energy, strengthen environmental protections, integrate climate considerations into public health, promote sustainable agriculture, and build green communities. By embracing a comprehensive approach to climate action, we can ensure a sustainable and resilient future for generations to come. 

Our planet is at a critical juncture. We must reject proposals that roll back environmental progress and instead champion policies that foster innovation, equity, and sustainability. The climate crisis demands bold and immediate action. By committing to protecting our environment and securing a healthy, prosperous future for all, we can rise to the challenge and create a legacy of resilience and sustainability.

Vote Biden. Vote Blue. 

Vote Biden. Vote Blue. They champion comprehensive and forward-thinking climate policies which are crucial for our future, health, and sustainability of our children and future generations. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

A Looming Water Crisis in Mountain Groundwater

/ activist360
The seasonal effects of increasing temperature on streamflow declines include complex exchanges between surface and groundwater that need to be explicitly modelled to avoid underestimating streamflow losses given a warmer future climate.
The seasonal effects of increasing temperature on streamflow declines include complex exchanges between surface and groundwater that need to be explicitly modelled to avoid underestimating streamflow losses given a warmer future climate. *See notes below source for additional details.

The Hidden Impact of Warming on Mountain Water Reserves

As climate change intensifies, its impact on our planet’s water resources becomes increasingly severe and complex. A new study published in Nature highlights a critical issue: the significant reduction in mountain groundwater storage due to global warming, with profound implications for streamflows and water availability. This research, utilizing high-resolution integrated hydrological models, reveals the alarming trend of declining groundwater, especially in mountainous regions that feed major river systems like the Colorado River.

Groundwater Storage at Risk

The study’s findings indicate that increased forest water usage, driven by warmer temperatures, is likely to reduce groundwater recharge significantly. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced during dry years, and recovery is minimal even in wetter periods. This trend spells trouble for regions dependent on mountain streams for their water supply, as these areas are expected to face drastic reductions in water availability.

Impact on the Colorado River Basin

The research specifically points to the Colorado River’s headwaters, including the Colorado Headwater and Gunnison basins, as areas where groundwater declines will be most significant. Considering that the Colorado River is a crucial water source for the southwestern United States, the implications are dire for water management in the region. The study predicts that this will exacerbate streamflow reductions, complicating water resource management and potentially leading to more frequent and severe water shortages.

Seasonal and Long-term Consequences

The effect of warming on seasonal snow dynamics and the timing of water flow into streams presents another layer of complexity. As temperatures rise, snow melts earlier, and the altered hydrograph timing can significantly impact the availability of water during crucial times of the year. The study emphasizes the need for models that accurately capture these interactions to predict future water availability more reliably.

Why It Matters

Understanding the link between groundwater storage, climate change, and water management is important for preparing for future challenges. As the study shows, the health of mountain water ecosystems and the communities relying on them is at stake. Proactive measures are needed to ensure sustainable water usage and to protect these vital resources from the impending impacts of climate change.

Summing Up

This study provides essential insights into the broader impacts of climate change on water resources, especially in regions heavily dependent on mountain streams for their water supply. It serves as a critical resource for policymakers, environmental scientists, and conservationists aiming to devise strategies to combat these challenges effectively.

Call to Action: The research advocates for the incorporation of detailed groundwater dynamics into hydrological models to improve the accuracy of predictions and water management strategies. It suggests that adaptive management strategies, particularly those integrating forest and water management, could mitigate some adverse effects, highlighting the urgent need for policies that consider these dynamics.

Source: Carroll, R. W. H., Niswonger, R. G., Ulrich, C., Varadharajan, C., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., & Williams, K. H. (2024). Declining groundwater storage expected to amplify mountain streamflow reductions in a warmer world. Nature Water, 2, 419-433. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00239-0?error=cookies_not_supported&code=492bd434-f4b4-4400-9407-476760f21cc1

Additional notes from graphic above:

The seasonal effects of increasing temperature on streamflow declines include complex exchanges between surface and groundwater that need to be explicitly modelled to avoid underestimating streamflow losses given a warmer future climate. *See notes below source for additional details.

Winter: warming will decrease snow coverage and promote the earlier onset of infiltration and runoff, although the net effect of annual warming on recharge will be less than under historical conditions. An increased winter stream stage coupled with lower water table elevations will drive increased seepage loss (that is, gradient-driven loss) in non-perennial streams to significantly lower annual streamflow. Summer: higher temperatures will promote increased evapotranspiration in the forested areas and riparian zones to limit the lateral movement of subsurface flow into stream channels. A decrease in groundwater entering streams will occur through falling water tables. Summer streamflow will be lower with a possible transition towards non-perennial conditions when evapotranspiration losses exceed groundwater inflows to streams. Qs = interflow + surface runoff to streams; Qg = groundwater flow to streams.

Source: Carroll, R. W. H., Niswonger, R. G., Ulrich, C., Varadharajan, C., Siirila-Woodburn, E. R., & Williams, K. H. (2024). Declining groundwater storage expected to amplify mountain streamflow reductions in a warmer world. *Nature Water*, 2, 419-433. https://www.nature.com/articles/s44221-024-00239-0?error=cookies_not_supported&code=492bd434-f4b4-4400-9407-476760f21cc1

Rising Temperatures and Inflation

/ activist360
Vegetables in a market.
Vegetables in a market. Credit: Photo by nrd on Unsplash.

Economic Implications of Climate Change

As global temperatures climb, economists and policymakers are increasingly concerned about the secondary effects on economic stability. A recent study published in Nature sheds light on how rising temperatures are likely to boost inflation levels, affecting economies worldwide. Here’s what you need to know about the correlation between global warming and inflation, based on the latest research.

Key Findings: Temperature Increases and Inflation

The study utilizes a vast dataset encompassing over 27,000 observations of monthly consumer price indices from around the world. The findings are clear: higher temperatures are associated with significant increases in both food prices and overall inflation. This relationship persists over a 12-month period following temperature increases, suggesting long-term economic impacts.

Potential Impact on Electricity Prices

The study also highlights how rising temperatures could impact electricity prices. While the data on electricity specifically is not as robust as for overall inflation, the implications are significant given the increased demand for cooling during hotter periods. This heightened demand can strain supply and elevate electricity prices, further complicating the economic challenges posed by climate change.

Impact on Labor Productivity and Agricultural Yields

Higher temperatures are linked to reduced labor productivity, particularly in outdoor and non-air-conditioned environments, and lower crop yields. These factors contribute to the inflationary pressures observed in the study. Reduced productivity and agricultural output exacerbate economic stress during heatwaves, making communities more vulnerable to price increases.

Regional Impact Variations

The inflationary impact of rising temperatures is not uniform across all geographies. In regions with higher latitudes, inflation spikes during the hottest months of the year. In contrast, at lower latitudes, where temperatures are generally warmer, inflationary pressures are more consistent throughout the year.

Future Projections and Economic Forecasting

Looking ahead to 2035, the study projects substantial increases in inflation due to expected temperature rises. Under various climate models and emissions scenarios, global average food inflation could increase by 0.92 to 3.23 percentage points per year, while headline inflation could rise by 0.32 to 1.18 percentage points per year. These projections highlight the urgency for adaptive measures in monetary policies and economic planning.

The cumulative marginal effect of temperature shocks on food and headline inflation.

The cumulative marginal effect of temperature shocks on food and headline inflation. From Kotz, M., Kuik, F., Lis, E., & Nickel, C. (2024). Global warming and heat extremes to enhance inflationary pressures. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(116). (a) A schematic outline of the mechanisms via which temperature shocks may impact inflation via agricultural productivity and food prices. The results of fixed-effects panel regressions from over 27,000 observations of monthly price indices and weather fluctuations worldwide over the period 1996-2021 demonstrate persistent impacts on food (b) and headline (c) prices from a one-off increase in monthly average temperature. Lines indicate the cumulative marginal effects of a one-off 1 C increase in monthly temperature on month-on-month inflation rates, evaluated at different baseline temperatures (colour) reflecting the non-linearity of the response by baseline temperatures which differ across both seasons and regions (see methods for a specific explanation of the estimation of these marginal effects from the regression models). Error bars show the 95% confidence intervals having clustered standard errors by country. Full regression results are shown in Tables S2 & S3. Icons are obtained from Flaticon using work from Febrian Hidayat, Vectors Tank and Freepik.

Implications for Monetary Policy

The direct correlation between temperature increases and inflation has significant implications for central banks and monetary policymakers. Traditional monetary policy may need to evolve to address the challenges posed by climate-induced inflation, especially as these effects become more pronounced.

The Necessity for Socioeconomic Adaptation

The study underscores a critical gap in socioeconomic adaptation to rising temperatures. Historical data suggests limited adaptation through economic development, pointing to the need for unprecedented changes in future strategies. To mitigate inflationary pressures, enhanced agricultural resilience and economic adjustments are essential.

Summing Up

This research provides a crucial understanding of how climate change directly affects economic fundamentals such as inflation. It underscores the necessity for policymakers, particularly in economic and financial sectors, to consider the broader impacts of climate change—not just environmental but also economic. As the planet warms, the intertwined fates of our climate and economies become increasingly hard to ignore, demanding integrated approaches to climate policy and economic management.

Source: Kotz, M., Kuik, F., Lis, E., & Nickel, C. (2024). Global warming and heat extremes to enhance inflationary pressures. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(116). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01173-x