Exposing the Climate Giants: The Impact of Carbon Majors on Global Emissions

/ activist360


Pollution emitter. Photo by Marcin Jozwiak on Unsplash

Carbon Majors: 57 fossil fuel and cement producers linked to 80% of global fossil CO2 emissions since the Paris Agreement

The Carbon Majors Database: Launch Report, a new comprehensive analysis conducted by InfluenceMap sheds light on the substantial impact that a small group of carbon-producing entities has on global CO2 emissions. This enlightening study traces back to 1854, identifying 117 producers responsible for a staggering 88% of global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and cement between 2016 and 2022. This revelation comes post-Paris Agreement, underscoring the paradox of increased fossil fuel production amidst global pledges for emission reduction.

The Carbon Majors Database

The Carbon Majors Database, initially developed by Richard Heede of the Climate Accountability Institute and now hosted by InfluenceMap, offers an astonishing look into the historical emissions of the world’s largest oil, gas, coal, and cement producers. By categorizing these entities into investor-owned, state-owned, and nation-states, the database highlights the disproportionate role these entities play in driving global CO2 emissions.



Top 10 entities global fossil CO2 emitters historically (1854–2022) and since Paris Agreement (2016–2022). Source: The Carbon Majors Database Launch Report, April 2024 by InfluenceMap.

The database reveals that 57 corporate and state entities linked to fossil fuel and cement production are responsible for 80% of the global emissions from 2016 through 2022. This period, notably after the Paris Agreement, has seen most fossil fuel companies ramp up their production, indicating a glaring misalignment with global climate goals.

The analysis underscores a troubling trend: the majority of fossil fuel companies have increased their production post-Paris Agreement, with a notable rise in emissions from Asian and Middle Eastern producers. This contradicts the global consensus on reducing fossil fuel dependence to mitigate climate change impacts.

Accountability and Climate Change

The report’s findings have implications in legal, regulatory, and academic contexts, offering a basis for holding fossil fuel producers accountable for their climate-related impacts. It emphasizes the need for corporate entities to align their operations with climate science and contribute to global emission reduction efforts.

A key insight from the report is the shift in coal production from investor-owned to state-owned entities, contributing to an increase in global coal consumption. This shift poses challenges to global emission reduction efforts, highlighting the need for comprehensive policies to address state-owned entities’ roles in coal production.

The report provides a granular look at emissions trends across different regions, with Asia and the Middle East experiencing significant increases in fossil fuel production and emissions. Conversely, North America and Europe show a more moderate trend, reflecting diverse global approaches to energy production and climate policy.

Final Thoughts

The Carbon Majors Report is a clarion call for immediate action against the entities most responsible for the climate crisis. There is an urgent need for global cooperation to halt the expansion of fossil fuel production and ensure a just transition to renewable energy sources. It underscores the imperative of global cooperation and corporate accountability in the pursuit of a sustainable future, emphasizing the role of data-driven analysis in informing policy and advocacy efforts.

Source: The Carbon Majors Database Launch Report, April 2024 by InfluenceMap.

Insights into the Thirst of the Southwest

/ activist360


Colorado River as it meanders south towards the Grand Canyon, taken near to Horse Shoe Bend AZ. Source: herdiephoto, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Insights from a New Comprehensive Water Accounting Study

The Colorado River, a lifeline for over 40 million people and over two million hectares of cropland, barely trickles into the Gulf of California’s shores. The river has reached a critical juncture due to decades of overuse and climate challenges.

A new study published in Nature provides a comprehensive water budget, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of water consumption and offering a roadmap toward sustainable management. The river’s dwindling flows underscore a pressing need for strategic interventions to ensure its survival and continued support for millions of people and vast agricultural lands.

The Heart of the Matter

The multi-year study conducted between 2000 and 2019, provides a granular analysis of water usage patterns, pinpointing agriculture as the dominant consumer. The findings indicate that irrigated agriculture accounts for a staggering 74% of direct human water use, with cattle feed crops such as alfalfa and grass as significant water guzzlers, accounting for 46% of direct water consumption.

Consumptive

Water consumed by each sector in the Colorado River Basin and sub-basins (including exports), based on 2000–2019 averages from the study New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea (Fig. 4).

The Colorado River’s Dilemma

The Colorado River’s plight tells a tale of natural variability alongside a stark reflection of human choices and their impacts on natural resources. The study’s revelations about the scale of agricultural water use, especially for cattle feed, invite a critical reassessment of water allocation priorities and the sustainability of current agricultural practices.

Navigating the Waters Ahead

Addressing the Colorado River’s challenges requires a multifaceted approach, combining policy reforms, technological innovations, and shifts in agricultural practices. The study advocates for a balanced water budget and the adoption of water-efficient technologies and crops.

With cattle feed crops utilizing a considerable portion of the river’s water, the study suggests reevaluating crop choices and water use efficiency. Implementing more sustainable practices, including alternative cropping patterns and enhanced irrigation techniques, could substantially reduce water stress. Moreover, it underscores the importance of collaborative water management strategies involving all stakeholders to ensure equitable and sustainable use.

Final Thoughts

The Colorado River’s diminishing flows serve as a wake-up call to address the unsustainable patterns of water consumption that threaten this critical water source. The comprehensive study lays the groundwork for informed decision-making, urging immediate action to safeguard the river’s future. Through collective efforts and sustainable practices, there is hope for restoring the balance and ensuring the Colorado River continues to sustain the Southwest for future generations.

Source: Richter, B.D., Lamsal, G., Marston, L. et al. New water accounting reveals why the Colorado River no longer reaches the sea. Commun Earth Environ 5, 134 (2024).

    The Real Cost of Fossil Fuels on Our Health

    / activist360
    Pump-jack
    Pump-jack mining crude oil with the sunset. Photo by Zbynek Burival on Unsplash.

    Fossil-Fuel Pollution and Its Dire Impact on Global Health

    Let’s talk about how burning fossil fuels, like coal, oil, and gas, isn’t just bad for the planet—they are harmful to our health too, particularly through the production of petrochemicals that are foundational to many industrial and everyday products. When we talk about climate change, we’re also talking about something that directly touches our lives, through the air we breathe, the water we drink, and even the products we use every day. Drawing directly from the insights from the New England Journal of Medicine‘s review article, “Health Effects of Fossil Fuel–Derived Endocrine Disruptors” by Dr. Tracey J. Woodruff, it’s evident that the adverse health impacts of fossil-fuel pollution include harmful health implications, including cancer.

    Global Impact of Pollution on Health

    Did you know that pollution from chemicals is a top reason people are dying prematurely, especially in poorer countries? Most of these deaths come from places that can least afford to deal with these problems. Pollution disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries, with over 90% of pollution-related deaths occurring in these regions. Experts think over 1.8 million people die each year because of this pollution, and that number might even be too low since we don’t know the full effects of all the chemicals due to the lack of comprehensive studies.

    Growing Concern of Petrochemical-Related Illnesses

    A big chunk of this problem comes from fossil fuels. When we dig them up and use them, they release a bunch of nasty chemicals. Many of these chemicals interfere with the endocrine system, acting as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Some of these chemicals mess with our hormones, leading to all sorts of health issues, from cancer to problems having babies. It’s a big deal because these chemicals are in so many things around us—from the plastic in toys and bottles to the makeup we might wear to pesticides on our fruits and vegetables.

    Over the last seventy years or so, as we’ve used more fossil fuels and made more stuff from petrochemicals, we’ve seen more people getting sick with long-term illnesses. And it’s not just happening in one place but all over the world. This trend underscores the critical need for awareness and action to mitigate the health risks associated with petrochemical exposure.

    Cancer and Petrochemical Exposure

    Cancer is a big focus here. It’s heartbreaking how common it has become, and part of the blame lies with the chemicals that come from using fossil fuels. Substances like benzene, found in crude oil and gasoline, and formaldehyde, a byproduct of natural gas combustion, have been classified as carcinogens with strong links to leukemia and nasopharyngeal cancer, respectively. These and other chemicals, pervasive in our environment and daily lives, are not passive occupants. They sneak into our bodies and mess with the way our cells work, leading to diseases like cancer. You might not even know you’re being exposed to them until it’s too late.

    Pervasive Problem of Plastics

    Moreover, the production and widespread use of plastics, a hallmark of petrochemical derivatives, contribute to the dispersion of these harmful substances into the environment, food chains, and ultimately, our bodies. Phthalates and bisphenols, used to make plastics softer and more durable, have been under scrutiny for their estrogen-like effects, which can potentially lead to breast and other hormone-related cancers.

    Taking Action Against Petrochemical Pollution

    So, what can we do? For starters, we need to be mindful of our exposure to these chemicals. But that’s not enough. We need big changes, like laws and policies, to make our environment cleaner and safer for everyone. And we’ve got to think about the future and shift towards sustainable and renewable energy sources.

    To wrap it up, the damage from fossil fuels to our health is huge, and it’s something we can’t ignore. It’s time for all of us to pay attention, push for change, and take steps toward a world where we’re not risking our health just by living in it. Together, we can fight for a healthier, cleaner future.