Reject Regression: Advocate for Bold Climate Action Against Project 2025’s Harmful Proposals

Warning: Project 2025 accelerates climate change! Vote Biden. Vote Blue.
Warning: Project 2025 accelerates climate change! Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025. Vote Biden. Vote Blue.


As the world grapples with the escalating impacts of climate change, urgent and decisive action is needed. However, Project 2025 proposes reforms that significantly undermine critical environmental protections and sustainable development efforts. These reforms threaten to derail progress on combating climate change, protecting public health, and ensuring environmental sustainability. These policies are regressive and dangerous. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025. Vote Biden. Vote Blue.

Energy Policy: Prioritizing Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Future

The proposed energy policy in Project 2025 advocates for an “all of the above” approach, emphasizing the continued use of fossil fuels while criticizing renewable energy initiatives. This perspective overlooks the urgent need to transition to cleaner energy sources to combat climate change. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Renewable energy and sustainability are imperative for ensuring long-term energy security. Prioritizing clean energy technologies like wind, solar, and advanced nuclear power can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, create jobs, and enhance energy independence. Policies should support renewable energy subsidies and climate initiatives that drive innovation and reduce our carbon footprint.

According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), renewable energy could, and should, account for 90% of the power sector’s decarbonization by 2050, creating millions of jobs and enhancing energy independence. Policies should support renewable energy subsidies, research and development in clean technologies, and the implementation of carbon pricing mechanisms to incentivize reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.

Environmental Protection: Strengthening the EPA’s Role

Project 2025 aims to eliminate climate change initiatives within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), criticizing them as economically burdensome. This perspective ignores the critical role that climate policies play in safeguarding public health and the environment. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Climate change initiatives are vital for long-term environmental sustainability. The EPA’s focus on renewable energy and stringent air quality standards ensures cleaner air, reduces health risks, and mitigates the impacts of climate change. Rather than eliminating these initiatives, we should strengthen the EPA’s capacity to enforce science-based regulations that protect both the environment and public health.

Health and Climate Change: Integrating Environmental Considerations

Project 2025 suggested for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) largely ignore the connections between public health and climate change. This oversight will result in dangerously inadequate preparation and response to health crises worsened by climate conditions. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Public health policies need to incorporate the impacts of climate change, which include increased heat-related illnesses, respiratory issues from air pollution, and the spread of climate-sensitive diseases. A robust public health system that addresses these challenges is crucial for building resilient communities. Policies should promote environmental health and prepare for the health impacts of a changing climate.

Agriculture and Water: Sustainable Practices for Long-Term Resilience

Project 2025 will downplay agricultural and water policies, focusing on deregulation and short-term economic gains. This approach leads to accelerated environmental degradation and resource depletion. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Sustainable agriculture and water management practices are essential for long-term resilience and our health! Policies should support conservation programs, promote water-efficient technologies, and encourage sustainable farming practices. Investing in sustainable agriculture ensures food security, protects natural resources, and mitigates the impacts of climate change on our ecosystems.

Housing and Urban Development: Building Green Communities

Project 2025 reverses climate change initiatives within the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) threatening to halt progress on sustainable urban development. Ignoring climate considerations in housing policies leads to higher energy costs and increased emissions. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Climate change initiatives in housing are crucial for promoting energy-efficient buildings and sustainable urban planning. Policies should incentivize green construction, support renewable energy integration, and ensure that urban development is resilient to climate impacts. Sustainable housing reduces energy costs, lowers emissions, and improves the quality of life in communities.

Summing Up

Project 2025 presents a regressive approach to climate policy, favoring short-term economic gains for a few over long-term sustainability. This perspective is not only shortsighted but also dangerous, as it undermines efforts to combat climate change and protect public health and the environment. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

We must advocate for policies that prioritize renewable energy, strengthen environmental protections, integrate climate considerations into public health, promote sustainable agriculture, and build green communities. By embracing a comprehensive approach to climate action, we can ensure a sustainable and resilient future for generations to come. 

Our planet is at a critical juncture. We must reject proposals that roll back environmental progress and instead champion policies that foster innovation, equity, and sustainability. The climate crisis demands bold and immediate action. By committing to protecting our environment and securing a healthy, prosperous future for all, we can rise to the challenge and create a legacy of resilience and sustainability.

Vote Biden. Vote Blue. 

Vote Biden. Vote Blue. They champion comprehensive and forward-thinking climate policies which are crucial for our future, health, and sustainability of our children and future generations. Reject Trump, Reject Project 2025.

Rising Temperatures and Inflation

Vegetables in a market.
Vegetables in a market. Credit: Photo by nrd on Unsplash.

Economic Implications of Climate Change

As global temperatures climb, economists and policymakers are increasingly concerned about the secondary effects on economic stability. A recent study published in Nature sheds light on how rising temperatures are likely to boost inflation levels, affecting economies worldwide. Here’s what you need to know about the correlation between global warming and inflation, based on the latest research.

Key Findings: Temperature Increases and Inflation

The study utilizes a vast dataset encompassing over 27,000 observations of monthly consumer price indices from around the world. The findings are clear: higher temperatures are associated with significant increases in both food prices and overall inflation. This relationship persists over a 12-month period following temperature increases, suggesting long-term economic impacts.

Potential Impact on Electricity Prices

The study also highlights how rising temperatures could impact electricity prices. While the data on electricity specifically is not as robust as for overall inflation, the implications are significant given the increased demand for cooling during hotter periods. This heightened demand can strain supply and elevate electricity prices, further complicating the economic challenges posed by climate change.

Impact on Labor Productivity and Agricultural Yields

Higher temperatures are linked to reduced labor productivity, particularly in outdoor and non-air-conditioned environments, and lower crop yields. These factors contribute to the inflationary pressures observed in the study. Reduced productivity and agricultural output exacerbate economic stress during heatwaves, making communities more vulnerable to price increases.

Regional Impact Variations

The inflationary impact of rising temperatures is not uniform across all geographies. In regions with higher latitudes, inflation spikes during the hottest months of the year. In contrast, at lower latitudes, where temperatures are generally warmer, inflationary pressures are more consistent throughout the year.

Future Projections and Economic Forecasting

Looking ahead to 2035, the study projects substantial increases in inflation due to expected temperature rises. Under various climate models and emissions scenarios, global average food inflation could increase by 0.92 to 3.23 percentage points per year, while headline inflation could rise by 0.32 to 1.18 percentage points per year. These projections highlight the urgency for adaptive measures in monetary policies and economic planning.

The cumulative marginal effect of temperature shocks on food and headline inflation.

The cumulative marginal effect of temperature shocks on food and headline inflation. From Kotz, M., Kuik, F., Lis, E., & Nickel, C. (2024). Global warming and heat extremes to enhance inflationary pressures. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(116). (a) A schematic outline of the mechanisms via which temperature shocks may impact inflation via agricultural productivity and food prices. The results of fixed-effects panel regressions from over 27,000 observations of monthly price indices and weather fluctuations worldwide over the period 1996-2021 demonstrate persistent impacts on food (b) and headline (c) prices from a one-off increase in monthly average temperature. Lines indicate the cumulative marginal effects of a one-off 1 C increase in monthly temperature on month-on-month inflation rates, evaluated at different baseline temperatures (colour) reflecting the non-linearity of the response by baseline temperatures which differ across both seasons and regions (see methods for a specific explanation of the estimation of these marginal effects from the regression models). Error bars show the 95% confidence intervals having clustered standard errors by country. Full regression results are shown in Tables S2 & S3. Icons are obtained from Flaticon using work from Febrian Hidayat, Vectors Tank and Freepik.

Implications for Monetary Policy

The direct correlation between temperature increases and inflation has significant implications for central banks and monetary policymakers. Traditional monetary policy may need to evolve to address the challenges posed by climate-induced inflation, especially as these effects become more pronounced.

The Necessity for Socioeconomic Adaptation

The study underscores a critical gap in socioeconomic adaptation to rising temperatures. Historical data suggests limited adaptation through economic development, pointing to the need for unprecedented changes in future strategies. To mitigate inflationary pressures, enhanced agricultural resilience and economic adjustments are essential.

Summing Up

This research provides a crucial understanding of how climate change directly affects economic fundamentals such as inflation. It underscores the necessity for policymakers, particularly in economic and financial sectors, to consider the broader impacts of climate change—not just environmental but also economic. As the planet warms, the intertwined fates of our climate and economies become increasingly hard to ignore, demanding integrated approaches to climate policy and economic management.


Source: Kotz, M., Kuik, F., Lis, E., & Nickel, C. (2024). Global warming and heat extremes to enhance inflationary pressures. Communications Earth & Environment, 5(116). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01173-x

Harnessing the Power of Rocks: A Sustainable Leap in Renewable Energy Storage

Nathan Schroeder, Walter Gerstle, and Luke McLaughlin discuss the design or an energy storage system that is being researched in by CSolPower and Sandia Labs. Photo by Craig Fritz.
Nathan Schroeder, Walter Gerstle, and Luke McLaughlin discuss the design or an energy storage system that is being researched in by CSolPower and Sandia Labs. Photo by Craig Fritz.

The Rock-Bed Revolution

New Mexico-based CSolPower, in partnership with Sandia National Laboratories, is pioneering a novel and cost-effective energy storage system using rocks. This groundbreaking approach aims to bolster the adoption of renewable energy sources, specifically solar and wind, by ensuring energy availability during high-demand periods or when these sources are intermittent.

According to Luke McLaughlin, a Sandia mechanical engineer, the storage system integrates renewable energy into an electrically charged thermal energy structure. Interestingly, regular gravel from landscaping firms can be employed in this system, eliminating the need for extensive preparation.

Under the lens at the National Solar Thermal Test Facility, a compact 100-kilowatt-hour test rig showcased the rock bed’s potential. With the ongoing installation of photovoltaic panels, the intent is to demonstrate the bed’s proficiency in using intermittent energy.

Walter Gerstle, CSolPower’s co-founder, emphasized the system’s versatility: “One of the advantages of thermal energy storage in rocks is that it can be built anywhere. It can be commodified and doesn’t require extensive permitting. We believe it can be implemented more quickly and economically than other approaches.”

One standout feature of CSolPower’s invention is its long-duration energy storage. Tests indicated that the rock bed could be heated to over 900°F and maintained for up to 20 hours. This facilitates storing excess daytime electricity as heat, which can later be used for warming water and homes in the evening.

Set for continued prototype testing till June 2024, CSolPower is keen on transitioning this lab-scale initiative into a market-ready solution. Successful trials might soon see northern New Mexico greenhouses utilizing this rock bed technology to maintain optimal temperatures throughout the year.

The Technology Readiness Gross Receipts initiative funds this project phase, aiming to aid New Mexico businesses in commercializing their innovations.

This rock-bed solution represents a promising stride towards green electricity generation and broadens the horizon for sustainable energy storage.