Diverse and profound symbols of fatherhood in nature

June 18, 2023 / activist360

*Angel Oak Tree | Charleston, South Carolina. Photo by Andrew Shelley on Unsplash.*

Happy Father’s Day to all the nature lovers out there!

This Father’s Day we’re taking a look at the diverse and profound symbols of “fatherhood” in nature. We found several nature-related symbols embodying fatherhood across a range of cultures and species. Take a quick journey with us to learn about these symbols.

Majestic father oak

Rooted in its attributes of strength, resilience, and longevity, the oak parallels qualities traditionally associated with fatherhood. Just as a father offers protection and guidance, the oak tree’s broad branches provide shelter. Its steadfast nature implies a dependable presence. In Celtic mythology, the oak was held in high reverence as a father figure, an emblem of stability and nurturing amid life’s tumultuous storms (Markale, J. (2004). The Celts: Uncovering the Mythic and Historic Origins of Western Culture). Its acorns, seen as seeds of potential, mirror a father’s role in fostering growth and development in his offspring. This majestic oak tree’s symbolism reflects the enduring, protective, and nurturing aspects of fatherhood, celebrating its essential role in the cycle of life.

Mountain, the patriarch

Mountains, due to their imposing stature, have been perceived as paternal figures across various cultures. Mount Olympus in Greek mythology was not only home to the gods but the dwelling place of Zeus, the father of gods and men (Source: Grimal, P. (1996). The Dictionary of Classical Mythology). Native American tribes like the Sioux perceive mountains as sacred and regard them as ‘grandfathers,’ signifying wisdom and spiritual guidance (Source: Brown, J. E. (1953). The Sacred Pipe: Black Elk’s Account of the Seven Rites of the Oglala Sioux).

Father sun

The sun, radiant and life-giving also represents fatherhood in numerous cultures. It exemplifies power, constancy, and nurturing. In Ancient Egyptian mythology, the sun god Ra was seen as the father of all gods, embodying warmth, life, and illumination (Source: Pinch, G. (2002). Handbook of Egyptian Mythology). Similarly, in many Native American cultures, the sun was often revered as a father figure, offering light, warmth, and growth to its children on Earth (Source: Hirschfelder, A. B., & Molin, P. F. (1992). The Encyclopedia of Native American Religions). The symbol of the father sun embodies the vital role of fathers as providers, protectors, and guiding lights in the lives of their offspring.

Lord lion

The lion serves as a powerful symbol of fatherhood. Renowned for its strength, courage, and protective instincts, the male lion’s role mirrors the archetypical father figure. It defends its pride against potential harm, embodying the protective aspect of fatherhood. The lion guides its young, teaching them essential survival skills, which encapsulates the mentoring facet of fatherhood (Source: DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies).

Eagle, the sire

The eagle, soaring high above the earth, represents a magnificent symbol of fatherhood in numerous cultures. Its exceptional strength, acute vision, and protective instincts correspond to the traditional roles and qualities associated with fatherhood. Among Native American cultures, the eagle, as a messenger of the Great Spirit, carries spiritual symbolism. It exemplifies wisdom, courage, and protective care – revered fatherly traits that guide and protect families (Source: Hirschfelder, A. B., & Molin, P. F. (1992). The Encyclopedia of Native American Religions). As the eagle prepares a safe nest and vigilantly guards its young, it embodies the nurturing and protective roles of a father. The soaring flight of the eagle conveys the encouragement fathers provide their children to reach great heights. The eagle’s symbolism captures the essence of fatherhood—nurturing, guiding, protecting, and inspiring the next generation.

Selfless seahorse as birthing papa

Unlike most species, it is the male seahorse that assumes the responsibility of pregnancy, challenging traditional paternal roles and symbolizing an exceptional level of paternal care and investment. This rare trait positions the seahorse as a representation of devoted fatherhood and redefines the boundaries of paternal roles within the natural world (Source: Wilson, R. A. (2010). The Labor of Words: Literary Professionalism in the Progressive Era). The male seahorse nurtures its young in its own body signifies a father’s deep commitment and selflessness, encapsulating an intimate bond with the offspring. The seahorse, in its unique biology, presents an unconventional yet compelling symbol of fatherhood, highlighting the profound nurturing, dedication, and flexibility inherent in this role.

The above examples show us that nature is rich with symbols that represent the multifaceted concept of “father.” These symbols extend from plants to celestial bodies to animals to sea life. They emphasize the qualities attributed to fatherhood—strength, protection, wisdom, and nurturing—and encapsulate the complex and universal essence of fatherhood.

Appreciating bees and their cognitive abilities

May 21, 2023 / activist360

Close-up Photo of Bee in Flower by Alexas Fotos: https://www.pexels.com/photo/close-up-photo-of-bee-in-flower-2198671/ — *Close-up photo of a bee in a flower by Alexas Fotos.*

Bees are remarkable creatures that support our ecosystems. They need protection and preservation.

Cognitive ability refers to the mental processes and skills involved in acquiring, processing, storing, and applying information. The American Psychological Association defines cognitive ability as, “the skills involved in performing the tasks associated with perception, learning, memory, understanding, awareness, reasoning, judgment, intuition, and language.”

Bees, particularly honeybees (Apis mellifera), exhibit remarkable cognitive abilities. They possess intricate navigational skills, communication systems, and memory capacity. In The Dancing Bees: An Account of the Life and Senses of the Honey Bee, author Karl von Frisch delves into the complex behaviors and sensory perceptions of honeybees. Von Frisch’s research and observations shed light on the cognitive prowess of bees, including their ability to communicate through intricate dances and navigate complex landscapes using visual cues.

Bees also demonstrate impressive learning and memory capabilities. They can associate visual, olfactory, and tactile cues with rewards or punishments. Studies, such as the research conducted by Randolf Menzel and Martin Giurfa reveal that bees can learn to recognize and remember specific colors, shapes, patterns, depth, and motion contrast, among others. They exhibit a capacity for associative learning, enabling them to solve complex tasks and adapt their behavior based on past experiences. Bees also possess a centralized nervous system and a complex array of sensory receptors, suggesting a capacity for processing and integrating sensory information.

In addition, bees have shown a remarkable ability to solve problems in laboratory settings. Research by Lars Chittka demonstrates how bees can learn to use tools, such as small sticks, to access out-of-reach rewards. This behavior suggests a level of cognitive flexibility and problem-solving skills beyond simple instinctual responses.

While it is challenging to measure subjective experiences in non-human animals, studies indicate that bees exhibit physiological and behavioral responses consistent with experiencing pain or distress. Research by Melissa Bateson and colleagues found that honeybees show a pessimistic bias in their decision-making after experiencing a negative event, suggesting that they could be regarded as exhibiting emotions. Sentience refers to the capacity of an organism to have subjective experiences, sensations, or conscious awareness of its own existence and in relation to the external world. It is often associated with the ability to feel pleasure or pain and have a sense of self-awareness. Since honeybees have been suggested to exhibit emotional states, this also implies that honeybees are sentient beings.

The potential sentience of bees alongside their cognitive abilities highlights the importance of preserving bee populations and their habitats for the well-being of these remarkable creatures and the ecosystems they support.

A new deal for nature?

January 22, 2023 / activist360

*Lake Forest. Image by Alain Audet from Pixabay*

Feeling out the new framework for biodiversity protection with the Kunming-Montreal pact

By Robert Nasi, Forests News

Well, they got there. After years-long delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a relocation from Kunming, China to Montreal, Canada, and following weeks of late-night negotiations peppered with walkouts and protests, a ‘new deal’ for biodiversity has been struck: on 19 December 2022, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) was adopted as the outcome of the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD).

The failure of the framework’s predecessor – none of the biodiversity targets set at Aichi in 2010 were reached by the 2020 deadline – added to the fraught tenure of the negotiations. The new framework isn’t perfect, as I’ll explain, but there are some important elements that, if implemented effectively and equitably, can make genuine impact.

Perhaps most notable is the target of protecting 30 percent of Earth’s land and sea by 2030. The global nature of the target means that the focus will be on the most biodiverse countries protecting key areas such as the tropical forests of the Amazon, the Congo Basin, and Indonesia – all areas where the Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF) has a strong presence and strong partnerships.

Given it took the global community almost six decades to protect 17% of the planet, this is a lofty goal that will require coordinated – and careful – action. Much protected area creation in the past has been propelled by colonialist ‘fortress conservation’ approaches that fail to take the rights, territories, and contributions of Indigenous Peoples and local communities into account. Such restrictive approaches have had dire consequences for people and nature, with both biodiversity and livelihoods crumbling as a result.

As such, the strong language on these issues in the new framework – which reaffirms the protection of Indigenous rights and territories throughout its 23 targets and four goals, and purports to ensure their voice in decision-making – is to be commended, though as always it will be crucial to pay careful attention to how and if this plays out on the ground. As much of CIFOR-ICRAF’s work highlights, it’s critically important to recognize human agency in the shaping of sustainable landscapes. As a global community, we need to become more skillful at differentiating between human activity that has been harmful and natural resource use that has been, is, or can be sustainable.

On that note, the agreement to develop a multilateral benefit-sharing and funding mechanism, to help put sovereignty over digital genetic code in the hands of those in whose land and sea-scapes it resides (rather than those of biopirates and corporations) is also significant. It was heartening, too, to see a new standalone target on gender equality and women and girls’ empowerment, and the inclusion of the term ‘gender-responsive’ in place of the weaker ‘gender-sensitive’. Also welcome is the (long overdue) target of reducing harmful subsidies for fisheries, agriculture and fossil fuels by at least USD 500 billion annually by 2030: right now, at least USD 1.8 trillion of such subsidies are financing the destruction of biodiversity each year.

Among these victories, it was disappointing to see the watering-down of language promoting and centering agroecology in the framework’s sustainable agriculture target. The final text reads, “The application of biodiversity-friendly practices, such as sustainable intensification, agroecological and other innovative approaches”; sustainable intensification, however, causes significant biodiversity loss and has been shown not to stop agricultural expansion. Another concern is that over-emphasis on protected areas through the 30×30 target could take away from necessary attention on developing biodiverse, inclusive, and resilient food systems – a subject on which CIFOR-ICRAF has a combined 70 years of international experience. Agroforestry and trees on farms, for instance, can play a significant role in restoring and enhancing ecosystems while producing critical food and nutrition.

Discussions on who will foot the bill for biodiversity conservation were also fraught, and wealthier countries’ reluctance to front up prompted the walk-out of delegates from over 70 countries in the Global South at one stage. In the end, the financial target of USD 200 billion a year for conservation initiatives – a sum determined to be critical for the framework’s success – was reached, through some developing countries such as the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Brazil and Malaysia expressed disappointment that richer ones did not offer up a larger amount, and that a new fund for biodiversity was not established.

So, now that we have an agreed path towards halting the loss of species and protecting the world’s remaining biodiversity, what lies ahead? By addressing the current polycrisis – biodiversity loss, climate crisis, growing inequalities, broken food systems, unsustainable supply chains – simultaneously through transdisciplinary science, CIFOR-ICRAF is delivering holistic solutions at scale in priority areas with the greatest potential for positive impact: sustainably managing multiple-use landscapes, promoting conservation in productive landscapes through agroecological approaches, and preserving local and global livelihoods. We will continue working to reverse negative environmental trends by generating evidence of the enormous value of trees – in forests, on farms, and across landscapes.

Robert Nasi is the Director General of the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)